Hollitscher never presented an argument who would direct, detailed, away from positivism so you’re able to realism and then he would have thought about the latest test which will make eg a disagreement because the philosophical folly. The guy rather created the realist status by itself, depicted they from the advice out of science and you will wise practice, shown how directly it had been connected with scientific research and everyday action and therefore found their electricity. (SFS, p. 113).
step three.2 Early Experience of Wittgenstein (1948–1952)
Feyerabend’s dominating mental engagement about late 1940s and you may early 1950s was a student in their capacity because student chief of your own “Kraft Community”. Viktor Kraft is an old person in brand new Vienna Circle, and you can turned into Feyerabend’s dissertation management. The fresh Kraft Network was a strategy bar centered to Kraft, and that constituted other area of the Austrian College or university Neighborhood. Bela Juhos, Walter Hollitscher, Georg Henrik von Wright, Elizabeth Anscombe and you can Wittgenstein were every seeing audio system. Feyerabend records the System stored conferences off 1949 in order to 1952 or 1953 (SFS, p. 109), which they put on their own the job of “offered philosophical trouble from inside the a beneficial nonmetaphysical styles with unique source into the findings of one’s sciences” (“Herbert Feigl: A beneficial Biographical Drawing”, when you look at the P. K.Feyerabend & Grams.Maxwell (eds.), Attention, Amount, and you may Means: Essays in the Philosophy and Technology in honor of Herbert Feigl, (Minneapolis: University regarding Minnesota Push, 1966), pp. 1–2) and that the main subjects from dialogue had been the questions out of reality away from theoretical organizations and of the latest “additional world”. On the Wittgenstein’s lecture, Feyerabend recalls the second:
Not really a quick and you will very interesting head to of the Wittgenstein themselves (from inside the 1952) you can expect to get better the talk. Wittgenstein was very impressive inside the way of presenting real instances, including amoebas below a great microscope… nevertheless when he remaining i however don’t know whether or not or perhaps not you will find an outward community, or, if there is one to, exactly what the arguments were in favour of they. (Feyerabend & Maxwell ibid., p. cuatro. Observe that Feyerabend need to have had the fresh new time completely wrong, since the Wittgenstein passed away inside the April 1951).
Feyerabend ultimately set-up such opinion from inside the a fascinating group of documents while it began with 1957, arguing one to research requires realism so you’re able to improvements, and this positivism perform stultify eg improvements
Wittgenstein, which grabbed lengthy and also make up their mind and you may next searched over an hour later offered a great saturated show and you can appeared to prefer our very own disrespectful attitude with the fawning fancy the guy encountered in other places. (SFS, p. 109).
When you look at the 1949, Feyerabend are lead so you’re able to Bertolt Brecht, and you may Hollitscher considering your the opportunity to become certainly Brecht’s production personnel, however, the guy became it down, later on detailing this among the biggest errors off his lifestyle (SFS, p. 114). Throughout the autobiography, yet not, the guy folds this statement, saying that he’d n’t have preferred becoming an element of the directly knit class that surrounded Brecht. (The causes getting his later defection in the Popperian camp see to possess been equivalent).
The fresh new University regarding Vienna’s physicists was in fact Hans Thirring, Karl Przibram, and you may Felix Ehrenhaft. Feyerabend admired Thirring and you will Ehrenhaft, and is determined by Ehrenhaft, who had lectured to your physics around away from 1947. Ehrenhaft was also known as a brutal and you can separate critic of the many kinds of orthodoxy from inside the physics, but is actually both thought of as a great charlatan. Feyerabend records he and his awesome other technology students featured forward so you can exposing him while the a scam, in facts was addressed, at the 1949 Alpbach convention, so you’re able to a fight anywhere between Ehrenhaft as well as the orthodox where the previous exhibited his experiments nevertheless the second defended their condition from the using steps which Galileo’s competitors might have been pleased with, ridiculing Ehrenhaft’s phenomena because the simple Dreckeffects. Feyerabend mentioned one “Just far after performed Ehrenhaft’s training drain for the and you will our feelings at the time as well as the feelings of one’s whole community given myself upcoming that have a great example of the type regarding medical rationality” (SFS, p. 111). Ehrenhaft did not persuade the latest theoreticians, exactly who protected themselves having an iron curtain off dogmatic faith out of the exact same type as you to definitely implemented from Michigan City IN sugar daddies the Galileo’s rivals. His listeners stayed staunch empiricists, never doubting one to technology needed to be adapted so you can points. Feyerabend said your big date-to-date providers from science, what Thomas Kuhn entitled “typical research”, usually do not occur instead this kind of “broke up understanding”.