A Complete Guide to Software Test Execution

By using QA Touch, you can manage and organize your test cases and the test executions effectively with high reusability and save your time. We regularly post some untangled content on the basics of testing, sure to check them out. Also, we cover a wide range of topics on the trends in software testing, quality, and more addressing the pain points of testers and developers all around the world.

• Manual testing is more time-consuming but allows testers to think outside the box, while automated tools save time but stick to a narrow script.
• However, one round of quick testing is required to ensure that none of the functionality is broken due to code changes/ defect fixes.
• This saves a lot of time if the primary intention was to run a few test cases only.
• You can develop your classifications and models based on the type of project you are dealing with.
• As testing software is a complex process, Test Execution helps development team ensure efficiency, reliability, and compliance with industry standards.

Small tests are sometimes referred to as Atomic Tests – each test is very small without having a dependency on other tests. A test that fails or passes independently of other tests makes it more reliable, faster to execute, and much easier to debug when it fails. As the complexity of our system under test increases, it will likely mean the number of our tests will keep growing exponentially. We can come into situations where we have many tests (especially for regression) and it can take many hours for all those tests to run. Not to mention the time and resources it takes to analyze the test results, investigate the failing tests, debug and fix the flaky ones, etc.

Test execution analysis examples

A testing tool in software testing refers to a Test execution tool or simply a tool that can run tests. Since they can record or capture manual tests, therefore, referred to as capture/playback tools, “capture/replay” tools, or “record/playback” tools. The process of automating repetitive test cases with automated testing tools is known as automated testing. The most effective technique to improve the efficiency, test coverage, and execution speed is through automation testing in software testing. Test execution results are assigned a status that’s easy to understand, with the results shown on a graph for easy analysis. Manual testing is more time-consuming but allows testers to think outside the box, while automated tools save time but stick to a narrow script.

Test reporting can take the form of status reports and final reports, as well as incident reports. The major reason entry criteria are needed is to avoid testing something before it is ready. Yes, early testing is good, but testing too early can be counter-productive. Something that becomes apparent when we look at the lifecycle view of testing are the levels of testing. Test levels often are based on scope, but they can also be driven by when they occur.

What is automation testing in software testing

This, as we can imagine, will vary based on their past work and knowledge. It means that as we go forward, we keep digging holes that will result in heavy monetary losses once they seep into production. Hence, for a smooth test execution, a well-planned and completed test design is required. However, one round of quick testing is required to ensure that none of the functionality is broken due to code changes/ defect fixes.

So without further ado let’s see what we can do to make our automated tests execute faster. Once defect is reported and logged, it should be mapped with the concerned failed/blocked test cases and corresponding requirements in Requirement Traceability Matrix. It helps to make a proper defect report and analyze the impishness in product. Once the test cases and requirements are mapped with the defect, stakeholders can analyze and take a decision on whether to fix/defer the defect based on priority and severity.

A Complete Guide to Software Test Execution

To help you gather a better understanding of this process, mentioned below are some of the notable points of test execution. When test execution begins, the test analysts start executing the test scripts based on test strategy allowed in the project. Advanced functions of the test execution engine maybe less important for software testing, but these advanced features could be essential when executing hardware/system tests. Test specification is selected, loaded and executed by the test execution engine similarly, as application software is selected, loaded and executed by operation systems. There are a number of other smaller things we can do to make our tests execute faster.

In this case, it compares the intended results with the actual results. The Test Execution phase is an essential part of the Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) and Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Apart from monitoring, there are other processes that are run post test execution and do not consider the execution state.

Best Practices for Test Management Process:

Note − In SIT testing, the QA team tries to find as many defects as possible to ensure the quality. Startups and major organizations are looking for a Test execution tool to expedite their development workflow and test automation workflow. On-premise testing involves significant infrastructure challenges and high maintenance costs and often comes with scalability issues. Therefore to avoid the hassle of test infrastructure, an ideal option is to choose a cloud-based Test execution tool like LambdaTest.

Then, we take a test case and define the probability of occurrence of each issue if that case is not executed. The higher the likelihood of a major issue, the higher the test case takes priority. For this, we needed tools that then became so popular that different organizations and communities of developers started bringing new and unique features to the table. Some could replay the tests, while some could run tests without any SDKs..

Create Jira issue

It’s the same for failed and blocked tests—you want to see that number going down. Developers can either create the code first, or write it specifically to pass the test execution meaning test cases. Within the suite, test cases may run in parallel or sequentially (where you can stop the execution of the suite if a single test case does not pass).

Test case execution requires documentation from the inception of the test case to its reporting. The integral part of test execution cycles is the actual execution of test cases itself. If any way we can increase the test execution process, we can increase the test execution cycle. The most important is we can execute the test quickly and wrap things faster than before. As a result, we can release the product quickly and shorten the testing cycle. In addition, as a complementary result, the cost of the projects can be reduced and the money can be spent on other high-priority things.

Reporting Your Test Results

Before we move on to the actual classification, we need to set the priorities. Similar to other sections, here, too, everything depends on testers, organization, and the project. You can develop your classifications and models based on the type of project you are dealing with. However, considering a general consensus, an organization may pick one of the following test execution priorities. Test Execution report shows the ratio of passed tests to all tests executed. This report shows the number of Test Case templates created, their executions, and the number of executions with the given status.