All educators on analysis was in fact formal Enneagram coaches on Narrative Customs. This new Enneagram Intensive training Programs used five pri type panels, (2) didactic discovering, (3) meditation knowledge, and (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Extreme Trainings coaches observed an outline entitled The newest Enneagram Intensive®: Integrating Emotional Existence and you will Spirit.
The 3 Introductory courses included pri training methods. The newest Berkeley course incorporated informal Enneagram style of boards and you will didactic discovering. The fresh Minnesota path made use of all four of first training modalities. The fresh new Palo Alto course used Enneagram type of boards, didactic understanding, and you may experiential mining including guided visualization.
Data Investigation
Surveys had been wrote from the a report secretary and you may delivered to a good Cook-Greuter-certified SCT scorer (Hy and you will Loevinger 1996) through blog post send. Code number were utilized so that the rater try blind so you can the type of your own decide to try, new schedules of your own test, in addition to studies category type. The fresh new scorer adopted the education because of the Susan Cook-Greuter, utilizing the new Loevinger tips guide, except for stems not in the tips guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored solutions was delivered back on the experts for the a be noticed pass on sheet that was after that useful analysis investigation. To ensure reliability of your rating having causes hence people went up otherwise down a couple of amounts, an example ones studies was also obtained by Prepare-Greuter herself.
Performance
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Because there are much more over the age of young people in this take to, a diagnosis is actually presented to evaluate the relationship between age group and you may studies impression. In total, 40 people (33%, n = ) increased no less than one level adopting the knowledge. Proportionally, even more 50–59 12 months olds (45%, n = ) as compared to most other age range enhanced no less than one amount just after the training (20% bbpeoplemeet coupon, n = 1/5, lower than 31; 0%, n = 0/step three, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, letter = 7/28, 40–49 12 months olds; and you can 24%, letter = 8/33, 60+ season olds). To look at if or not so it development try mathematically significant, an excellent ? 2 sample regarding freedom was computed by the researching age group and you may whether a person knowledgeable ego phase growth of one or more amounts following the intervention (or not).
A diagnosis has also been held to check on the relationship anywhere between fellow member gender and knowledge impact. Although proportionally, a great deal more ladies (36%, n = ) than just men (18%, n = 4/22) complex no less than one stages adopting the training, an effective ? 2 sample out of liberty found no matchmaking between intercourse and you can pride development.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.